Monday, May 23, 2011
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Rule 49-O
Rule 49-O is a rule in The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961[1] of India, which governs elections in the country. It describes the procedure to be followed when a valid voter decides not to cast his vote, and decides to record this fact. The apparent purpose of this section is to prevent the election fraud or the misuse of votes.
Contents
[hide]
1 Text of Rule 49-O
2 Present Implications of Rule 49-O
3 Proposals by the Election Commission of India
4 Disqualification hoax
5 Criticism of proposals regarding negative voting and annulment of polling due to neutral votes
6 Abuse of "49 O"
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
[edit] Text of Rule 49-O
49-O. Elector deciding not to vote.-If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark.[1] /
[edit] Present Implications of Rule 49-O
Since the ballot paper / Electronic voting machine (EVM) contains only the list of candidates, a voter cannot record his vote under Section 49-O directly. He must inform the presiding officer at the election booth. This violates the secrecy of the ballot. However, with paper ballot a different method is used to "waste" ones vote, which is stamping on multiple candidates. In fact this was the standard method of giving null votes without violating secrecy before the advent of the EVM.
At present, in an election, a winner will be declared irrespective of the number of 'non-votes'. However, a note of every 'non-vote' will be made with the Election Officer, and the total number of non-voters will, presumably, be available under the Right to Information Act.
[edit] Proposals by the Election Commission of India
Among the proposed electoral reforms[2] submitted in 2004 to the then Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh the then Chief Election Commissioner of India, T.S. Krishnamurthy, suggested the following:
NEGATIVE / NEUTRAL VOTING/JINGLY
The Commission has received proposals from a very large number of individuals and organizations that there should be a provision enabling a voter to reject all the candidates in the constituency if he does not find them suitable. In the voting using the conventional ballot paper and ballot boxes, an elector can drop the ballot paper without marking his vote against any of the candidates, if he chooses so. However, in the voting using the Electronic Voting Machines, such a facility is not available to the voter. Although, Rule 49 O of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 provides that an elector may refuse to vote after he has been identified and necessary entries made in the Register of Electors and the marked copy of the electoral roll, the secrecy of voting is not protected here inasmuch as the polling officials and the polling agents in the polling station get to know about the decision of such a voter.
The Commission recommends that the law should be amended to specifically provide for negative / neutral voting. For this purpose, Rules 22 and 49B of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 may be suitably amended adding a proviso that in the ballot paper and the particulars on the ballot unit, in the column relating to names of candidates, after the entry relating to the last candidate, there shall be a column None of the above, to enable a voter to reject all the candidates, if he chooses so. Such a proposal was earlier made by the Commission in 2001 (vide letter dated 10.12.2001).
[edit] Disqualification hoax
A hoax has been circulating which claims that if the '49-O' votes more than those of the winning candidate, then that poll will be canceled and will have to be re-polled. Furthermore, it claims that the contestants will be banned and they cannot contest the re-polling for their lifetime. This is false and has no basis whatsoever. Please see/read this/here for clarification.
[edit] Criticism of proposals regarding negative voting and annulment of polling due to neutral votes
An argument in favour of provision of neutral voting is that it ensures the individual's freedom to choose whether or not to vote. Russia allows voters to vote "against all" candidates.
The proposals of negative voting by the election commission and annulment of polling if neutral votes exceed those of the winning candidate have been criticised by experts.
It is the duty of every citizen to educate himself / herself about the agenda of the candidates and to vote conscientiously for the candidate they think is better. The very purpose of an election is that the representatives should be chosen by the people. Encouraging people not to express their preferred candidate goes against the intended purpose. For this reason, voting is compulsory by law in Australia. Also, annulling an election would result in much waste of public funds spent to conduct polls.
[edit] Abuse of "49 O"
email and SMS citing article "49-0 rule in The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 of India”, under which a citizen has the right to go to the polling booth, identify himself and REFUSE to vote for any candidate. The email and SMS was a chain message asking all the citizens to make use of this article and refuse to vote in order to protest against the corrupt government and politicians.
The people of this country are being misguided and led down the wrong path by the media. The mass media is fueling this emotional upheaval in the wrong direction.
49-O is preventing them from thinking rationally and developing an negative attitude towards our democratic system, Instead of developing their positive energy towards finding a good leaders.
“Election is fair chance to bring a good leaders not to express their protest against the corrupt government and politicians.”
[edit] See also
Elections in India
Compulsory voting
Negative voting
[edit] References
^ a b The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961
^ Proposed electoral reforms
[edit] External links
Election Commission of India
Contents
[hide]
1 Text of Rule 49-O
2 Present Implications of Rule 49-O
3 Proposals by the Election Commission of India
4 Disqualification hoax
5 Criticism of proposals regarding negative voting and annulment of polling due to neutral votes
6 Abuse of "49 O"
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
[edit] Text of Rule 49-O
49-O. Elector deciding not to vote.-If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark.[1] /
[edit] Present Implications of Rule 49-O
Since the ballot paper / Electronic voting machine (EVM) contains only the list of candidates, a voter cannot record his vote under Section 49-O directly. He must inform the presiding officer at the election booth. This violates the secrecy of the ballot. However, with paper ballot a different method is used to "waste" ones vote, which is stamping on multiple candidates. In fact this was the standard method of giving null votes without violating secrecy before the advent of the EVM.
At present, in an election, a winner will be declared irrespective of the number of 'non-votes'. However, a note of every 'non-vote' will be made with the Election Officer, and the total number of non-voters will, presumably, be available under the Right to Information Act.
[edit] Proposals by the Election Commission of India
Among the proposed electoral reforms[2] submitted in 2004 to the then Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh the then Chief Election Commissioner of India, T.S. Krishnamurthy, suggested the following:
NEGATIVE / NEUTRAL VOTING/JINGLY
The Commission has received proposals from a very large number of individuals and organizations that there should be a provision enabling a voter to reject all the candidates in the constituency if he does not find them suitable. In the voting using the conventional ballot paper and ballot boxes, an elector can drop the ballot paper without marking his vote against any of the candidates, if he chooses so. However, in the voting using the Electronic Voting Machines, such a facility is not available to the voter. Although, Rule 49 O of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 provides that an elector may refuse to vote after he has been identified and necessary entries made in the Register of Electors and the marked copy of the electoral roll, the secrecy of voting is not protected here inasmuch as the polling officials and the polling agents in the polling station get to know about the decision of such a voter.
The Commission recommends that the law should be amended to specifically provide for negative / neutral voting. For this purpose, Rules 22 and 49B of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 may be suitably amended adding a proviso that in the ballot paper and the particulars on the ballot unit, in the column relating to names of candidates, after the entry relating to the last candidate, there shall be a column None of the above, to enable a voter to reject all the candidates, if he chooses so. Such a proposal was earlier made by the Commission in 2001 (vide letter dated 10.12.2001).
[edit] Disqualification hoax
A hoax has been circulating which claims that if the '49-O' votes more than those of the winning candidate, then that poll will be canceled and will have to be re-polled. Furthermore, it claims that the contestants will be banned and they cannot contest the re-polling for their lifetime. This is false and has no basis whatsoever. Please see/read this/here for clarification.
[edit] Criticism of proposals regarding negative voting and annulment of polling due to neutral votes
An argument in favour of provision of neutral voting is that it ensures the individual's freedom to choose whether or not to vote. Russia allows voters to vote "against all" candidates.
The proposals of negative voting by the election commission and annulment of polling if neutral votes exceed those of the winning candidate have been criticised by experts.
It is the duty of every citizen to educate himself / herself about the agenda of the candidates and to vote conscientiously for the candidate they think is better. The very purpose of an election is that the representatives should be chosen by the people. Encouraging people not to express their preferred candidate goes against the intended purpose. For this reason, voting is compulsory by law in Australia. Also, annulling an election would result in much waste of public funds spent to conduct polls.
[edit] Abuse of "49 O"
email and SMS citing article "49-0 rule in The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 of India”, under which a citizen has the right to go to the polling booth, identify himself and REFUSE to vote for any candidate. The email and SMS was a chain message asking all the citizens to make use of this article and refuse to vote in order to protest against the corrupt government and politicians.
The people of this country are being misguided and led down the wrong path by the media. The mass media is fueling this emotional upheaval in the wrong direction.
49-O is preventing them from thinking rationally and developing an negative attitude towards our democratic system, Instead of developing their positive energy towards finding a good leaders.
“Election is fair chance to bring a good leaders not to express their protest against the corrupt government and politicians.”
[edit] See also
Elections in India
Compulsory voting
Negative voting
[edit] References
^ a b The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961
^ Proposed electoral reforms
[edit] External links
Election Commission of India
Indian names in Swiss bank disclosure to WikiLeaks?
Although information is sketchy, it might lead to more leads.
Annapurna Convertibles reportedly has $85 million and Anna Investments $9.7 million in Julius Baer bank. These are among the 2,000 names in two discs Rudolf Elmer gave WikiLeaks.
These are believed to be account details of prominent people and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has promised to provide details.
The data is not yet available on the WikiLeaks website. It was held on two discs handed over by Elmer at a press conference in London. Assange promised full disclosure once information had been vetted.
Elmer is scheduled to go on trial in Switzerland on Wednesday for breaking bank secrecy laws.
The banker, who has given data to WikiLeaks before, was fired from Julius Baer in 2002
Annapurna Convertibles reportedly has $85 million and Anna Investments $9.7 million in Julius Baer bank. These are among the 2,000 names in two discs Rudolf Elmer gave WikiLeaks.
These are believed to be account details of prominent people and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has promised to provide details.
The data is not yet available on the WikiLeaks website. It was held on two discs handed over by Elmer at a press conference in London. Assange promised full disclosure once information had been vetted.
Elmer is scheduled to go on trial in Switzerland on Wednesday for breaking bank secrecy laws.
The banker, who has given data to WikiLeaks before, was fired from Julius Baer in 2002
Indian names in Swiss bank disclosure to WikiLeaks?
Indian names in Swiss bank disclosure to WikiLeaks?
NEW DELHI: Details of Swiss bank accounts given to WikiLeaks by private banker-turned-whistleblower Rudolf Elmer has a few Indian names.The data revealed names of Indian entities including two apparently linked firms — Annapurna Convertible and Anna Investments — and two individuals Asad Ali Khan and Zahida Ali Khan.
The story was reported by the television channel, Headlines Today, which said that it was not in a position to verify the details. Elmer is a former employee of Swiss bank Julius Baer and the bank has said he had leaked the accounts motivated by unfulfilled career expectations.
The Times of India
No vote' option not yet in EVMs
CHENNAI: The 49 O' option, which gives a voter the choice of not voting for any candidate, will be not be included in electronic voting machines (EVMs) before the upcoming assembly polls in Tamil Nadu.
"The move to include a button in the EVM for the 49 O' option requires amending the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961. As the time is short and legal implications are involved, no additional button will be there in EVMs for Tamil Nadu elections, " election commissioner V S Sampath told TOI. The existing option of voters asking the presiding officer for exercising the 49 O' option in the polling booth will continue, he said.
Incidentally, the Electoral Integrity Forum, formed recently by retired civil servants in Chennai, has sent a memorandum to the chief election commissioner seeking to include the option in EVMs.
"The move to include a button in the EVM for the 49 O' option requires amending the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961. As the time is short and legal implications are involved, no additional button will be there in EVMs for Tamil Nadu elections, " election commissioner V S Sampath told TOI. The existing option of voters asking the presiding officer for exercising the 49 O' option in the polling booth will continue, he said.
Incidentally, the Electoral Integrity Forum, formed recently by retired civil servants in Chennai, has sent a memorandum to the chief election commissioner seeking to include the option in EVMs.
- Classroom Voting SystemsBuy Student Response Systems Online Reply, ResponseCard, and Software www.audience-response-rentals.com/
- The New Fluidic Vernafrom Hyundai. A Sedan that’ll Set You Thinking. To Know More Visit www.Hyundai.com/FluidicVerna
Sources in the election commission also said the CEC had forwarded the memorandum to the legal cell and is likely to seek the opinion of constitutional experts.
"Election Commission will not go in for a special awareness campaign to educate voters on the option as it will be against the ethics. As part of general awareness campaigns, the EC will also mention about the not to vote option," Sampath said.
Asked whether a voter who exercises this option will be considered to have voted, Sampath said it should be the case. On the fear that the voting percentage is likely to come down if more people come to know of the option, Sampath said the fear was there but it will be known only if voters exercise the option during elections.
State's chief electoral officer Praveenkumar said: "The EC would first make the officials sitting in the polling booths aware of the option. Many officials are lethargic or ignorant of the rule and refuse to help the voter in exercising the option." On creating awareness among the voters, Praveenkumar said the election commission has to take steps in this regard.
Nearly 10,000 voters exercised the option in Chennai and Sriperumbudur constituencies in the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. Many people hit by the airport expansion project exercised the option and in several booths the officials were caught unawares when voters wanted to exercise the option.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)